Well, I'm hoping for a period of Indian Summer we usually get, after a deluge of rain here in Portland, Oregon. I made pumpkin cookies a few days ago, and heated up some apple cider w/ a half cinnamon stick, a pinch of brown sugar, 4-5 whole cloves and a dash of allspice. I'll miss all the fruit and veggies of the summer, but now it's squash and apple time. I harvested the rest of the rhubarb yesterday before mowing the lawn. That means rhubarb strawberry pie and rhubarb muffins. Carb City...
The news story of the young woman shot in Washington DC was so disturbing. I made the following comments on one of the news articles:
The government knows it's a medical killing machine:
by Jon Rappoport
October 5, 2013
Here are four smoking guns that substantiate the title of this article.
Smoking gun #1: As I detailed in my two previous articles, Dr. Barbara Starfield's article in the July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, "Is US Health Really the Best in the World?", spelled out the damage:
The US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. That's well over two MILLION deaths per decade.
The US government supports, in numerous ways, this system. And now, through the implementation of Obamacare, many more previously uninsured Americans will enter the killing fields.
Dr. Starfield's data are not classified. They're not a state secret. Any doctor or medical bureaucrat has access to them.
Yet nothing of note is being done to remedy the ongoing crime.
Smoking gun #2: Starfield's report indicated that, every year in the US, 106,000 Americans die as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs.
The FDA is the only agency tasked with certifying these drugs as safe and effective. With such certification, the drugs enter the public pipeline.
On the FDA's own website, under the heading, "Why Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions," appears the following text: "Over 2 MILLION ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions] yearly; 100,000 DEATHS yearly; ADRs 4th leading cause of death..."
Astonishingly, the FDA takes no responsibility for any of this. They, and only they, can approve the drugs as safe and effective. They list the numbers of deaths and maimings, and they never admit culpability.
Smoking gun #3: It's common knowledge that there is a revolving door between the FDA and drug companies. Employees come and go from one organization/agency to another. The FDA and the pharmaceutical industry are, in significant respects, partners.
For years, there were reports of payoffs and pressure, at the FDA, to grant approval to drugs that were, in fact, harmful and dangerous.
Then, in 2009 and again in July 2012, a scandal erupted. As Truthout reported, it focused on "an institutionalized FDA spying program on its own scientists, law makers, reporters and academics that included an enemies list..."
At the heart of the scandal: FDA pressure on its own people to approve medical devices that were dangerous.
Truthout took a further step. It interviewed Ronald Cavanagh, a former drug reviewer for the FDA. (July 29, 2012, "Former FDA Reviewer Speaks Out About Intimidation and Marginalizing of Safety")
In a stunning interview with Truthout's Martha Rosenberg, Cavanagh, exposed the FDA as a relentless criminal mafia protecting its client, Big Pharma, with a host of mob strategies.
Cavanagh: "...widespread racketeering, including witness tampering and witness retaliation."
"I was threatened with prison."
"One [FDA] manager threatened my children...I was afraid that I could be killed for talking to Congress and criminal investigators."
Cavanagh reviewed new drug applications made to the FDA by pharmaceutical companies. He was one of the holdouts at the Agency, who insisted that the drugs had to be safe and effective before being released to the public. That's why he was under the gun.
Honest appraisal wasn't part of the FDA culture, and Cavanagh swam against the tide, until he realized his life and the life of his children might be on the line.
What was his secret and unofficial task at the FDA supposed to be? "Drug reviewers were clearly told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs." In other words, rubber stamp them. Say the drugs were safe and effective when they were not.
Cavanagh's revelations are astonishing. He recalls a meeting where a drug-company representative flat-out stated that his company had paid the FDA for a new-drug approval. Paid for it. As in bribe.
Cavanagh remarks that the drug pyridostigmine, given to US troops to prevent the later effects of nerve gas, "actually increased the lethality" of certain nerve agents.
Cavanagh recalls being given records of safety data on a drug that was up for approval---and then his bosses told him which sections not to read. Obviously, they knew the drug was dangerous and they knew exactly where, in the reports, that fact would be revealed.
The FDA is an ongoing criminal enterprise, and any government official, serving in any capacity, who has become aware of it and has not taken action, is an accessory to mass poisoning of the population.
Smoking gun #4: Before the FDA considers approving a new drug, studies and clinical trials have to be done. The drug companies do those clinical trials and submit the results to the FDA.
Obviously, the results look good; otherwise the FDA wouldn't be able to certify the drugs as safe and effective.
This raises the specter of research fraud---because, since the drugs kill 106,000 Americans every year, how can published studies praising these drugs be authentic and credible?
On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published a devastating quote from a woman who, for 20 years, edited the most prestigious medical journal in the world:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."
(Marcia Angell, MD, "Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Here is another quote of a similar nature, also published in the NY Review of Books (May 12, 2001, Helen Epstein, "Flu Warning: Beware of Drug Companies"):
"Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false."
Here's another quote from the same article:
"Last year, GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia was linked to thousands of heart attacks, and earlier in the decade, the company's antidepressant Paxil was discovered to exacerbate the risk of suicide in young people. Merck's painkiller Vioxx was also linked to thousands of heart disease deaths. In each case, the scientific literature gave little hint of these dangers."
And finally, here is yet another statement from Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine:
"A review of seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies [that praised the drugs] were published. But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome."
It turns out that the informational pipeline that feeds the entire perception of pharmaceutical medicine is a rank fraud.
Could any major newspaper add up these quotes and launch an all-out attack on the massive crimes surrounding medical studies? Of course. And that attack, if carried out long enough, would shake the pillars of the Church of Modern Medicine. But it doesn't happen.
Neither do we see extensive Congressional hearings on the horrendous effects of the US medical system. The Dept. of Justice does nothing, when they should be making mass arrests and laying on criminal prosecutions.
They know the scope of the medical killings and maimings. They choose to do nothing.
And now, into the maw of this dragon of death, will step millions of previously uninsured Americans, glad recipients of Obamacare.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections:
October 6, 2013: A Congresswoman gets an article/photo op and uses the death of this woman as an opportunity to market 'treatment' for post partum depression. My response:
"The psychiatric meds she was put on are most likely the problem. Side effects of anti-depressants are suicidal and homicidal ideation, and withdrawal-forgetting to take them or stopping them suddenly, cause psychosis. American mothers will now be a greater subject for post-partum drugging. Nursing babies will have no chance for brain normalcy, and the number of moms killing themselves or their children will also rise. This politician is only making a non-proven slot for this story to fit into, in her political 'op'. We need leaders. Not sheep as leaders. As far as anger towards Obama, the whole nation must be post partum."
